If Motion #1 passes, what happens to the existing pamphlet?

When considering the implications of Motion #1, it's important to focus on the intended outcomes of such motions in conference settings. If a motion is passed that specifically states an existing pamphlet is to be deemed unusable, it would suggest that the content within is either considered outdated, inaccurate, or no longer aligned with the current policies or messages being promoted. This direct action indicates a clear intention to invalidate that pamphlet's use in practice or reference, ensuring that any materials shared moving forward will adhere to the new directives established by the motion.

The other options present alternative scenarios that do not align with the consequence specified in the question. For instance, stating that the pamphlet remains unchanged would contradict the purpose of the motion, which implies a transformation in usage or relevance. Similarly, the suggestion that the pamphlet might still be used as a reference or is reviewed for updates indicates that it retains some form of validity or usefulness, which would not be the case if it is deemed unusable. Hence, recognizing the specific nature of the motion is critical to understanding why deeming the pamphlet unusable is the correct interpretation of the outcome.